On this page
A funder who finds a position you did not mention has learned two things: that the merchant is carrying more than you said, and that your files need checking. The first costs you the deal, the second the next ten. Finding it yourself lets you place the file deliberately.
What a UCC-1 search actually tells you
That a secured party filed a public notice claiming an interest in the business’s assets, on a particular date. That is the whole of it: the record is thin by design, and brokers read more into it than it holds.
| What the search shows | What it cannot tell you |
|---|---|
| A secured party filed a claim | The amount advanced |
| The date they filed it | The factor rate or term |
| The debtor name and address | The outstanding balance |
| A collateral description | Whether it has been repaid |
So a hit is a prompt for a conversation, not a verdict: a filing from sixteen months ago on an advance that paid off in full looks identical to one taken last week and still drawing daily. A clean search proves less than it appears to, because not every funder files. What a UCC-1 filing is covers the document itself.
Search the exact legal name, and nothing else
A search that comes back empty when it should not have usually failed on the name. These indexes match strings, not businesses.
- Use the registered legal name from the application or the state business registry, not the name over the door. A trade name returns nothing.
- The suffix is part of the name. Delgado Plumbing LLC and Delgado Plumbing Inc are two different debtors, and many interfaces will not bridge them.
- Punctuation is handled unevenly. If the exact string returns nothing, try it again without commas or periods.
- Check a predecessor entity if the structure changed. A business that incorporated in 2024 may carry filings under the owner’s name.
- Search the state where the business is organised, which is not always the state it trades in. There is no national index, and search costs vary by state — which states publish UCC data free has the routes.
Reading the result
A debtor with any history returns more rows than they have positions: every later action against a filing is recorded separately against the same filing number. A terminated filing still appears in most interfaces, because the index records what was filed rather than what is in force. Read the status before you count a row as live.
Turning those rows into a number is its own job: which are advances, which secured parties are one funder twice, and which name a filing agent rather than the funder. Counting a merchant’s existing positions does that, and why a filing names an agent covers the rest.
When the search is not worth doing
Most of the time the statements are the better check, and they are already in your hands. Four months of them show every remittance leaving the account, how often, and whether it is still running.
- Skip it when four clean months match what the merchant told you.
- Skip it when the state charges per search and you have decided to decline the file.
- Do it when the merchant’s account and the statements disagree, or when a debit looks like a remittance nobody can place.
- Do it when the file is going to a funder with a hard position limit, where a surprise costs the relationship and not just the deal.
None of this makes a file fundable that was not. It buys the chance to place it honestly: a second-position deal sent to a funder who writes second position, with the position stated in the submission, rather than a first-position file that comes apart in underwriting.
Questions brokers ask
How do you find out if a merchant already has an advance?
Ask the merchant for a list of positions, search the UCC index in the state of organisation under the exact legal name, then read four months of bank statements for recurring debits. The statements are strongest, because they show what is still being taken.
Does a UCC search show how much a merchant still owes?
No. It records that a secured party claimed an interest, and when: no amount, no factor rate, no term, no balance, and nothing about whether it was repaid. One taken last week looks like one that closed a year ago.
Which state do you search for a merchant’s UCC filings?
The state where the business is organised, which is not always the state it trades in, and there is no national index to fall back on. Add the state of operations when the entity history is unclear.
Why does a UCC search come back empty when the merchant clearly has a position?
Usually the name, because these indexes match strings: a trade name returns nothing, and so does the wrong entity suffix. Beyond that, a predecessor entity holds the filing, the state is wrong, or the funder never filed.
Do you need to run a UCC search on every file?
No. With four clean months that match what the merchant told you, it rarely changes the placement. Run it when the statements and the merchant disagree, when a debit looks like a remittance nobody can account for, or when the funder has a hard position limit.
Reference
The conversation after you find oneWhat to establish with the merchant before you place anything, and when to walk.
Alex Makowski
Founder, Infinite Bookings
Runs the lead generation operation behind Infinite Bookings — paid traffic, the funding application, and the delivery pipeline that puts records into brokers’ CRMs.
Reachable directly at alex@infinitebookings.com or 732-609-7182.