Commission is paid once and carries no risk. Syndication converts a broker from an intermediary into a participant, and the two roles pull in different directions more often than people admit when they start.
The mechanics
- The funder writes the advance and offers a share to syndicators.
- You fund that percentage of the advance amount at closing.
- You receive that percentage of every remittance as it is collected.
- If the merchant defaults you lose your share of what has not been collected.
- Fees and the treatment of defaults are set by the syndication agreement, and they vary a great deal.
The conflict to name out loud
A broker who chooses where to place a file and also syndicates into it has a reason to prefer the funder who lets them participate over the funder who offers the merchant a better deal. That is a real conflict and it is worth being deliberate about — the merchant is not in a position to notice.
| Commission only | Commission plus syndication | |
|---|---|---|
| Risk | None after funding | Your capital, at risk |
| Return | Fixed, paid once | Higher if it performs, negative if it defaults |
| Cash flow | Immediate | Over the term |
| Incentive | Volume | Deal quality |
| Conflict | Low | Real, and needs managing |
The fourth row is the honest argument in favour. A broker with money in the deal cares whether it performs, and that alignment does show up in the quality of what they submit.
Questions brokers ask
What is syndication in merchant cash advance?
Funding a percentage of an advance with your own capital and receiving that percentage of the repayments, instead of earning only a commission on the placement.
What returns does syndication produce?
Higher than commission when the advance performs and negative when it defaults. The return depends heavily on the syndication agreement — particularly how fees and partial recoveries are allocated.
What should you check in a syndication agreement?
Whether management fees come off the top before the split, how partial recoveries are allocated, and whether the funder is syndicating its weakest paper. None of it is standardised.
Is there a conflict of interest in syndicating your own deals?
Yes, a real one. A broker who chooses the funder and also participates has a reason to prefer the funder who lets them in over the one offering the merchant better terms.
Does syndication improve deal quality?
It aligns the incentive — a broker with capital in the deal cares whether it performs, and that does show up in submissions. It is the strongest argument in favour of the practice.
