Between 30 August and 5 September 2026 our main Meta campaign spent $18,452.78 and produced 767 qualified submissions — $24.07 per lead. Every one cleared $30K a month in revenue, a $15K minimum request, six months in business, four months of statements available, and a six-digit code entered from its own mobile. That is the number a properly-run account produces at roughly $2,600 a day; it is not the number a new account produces in its first month.
Almost nobody in this market publishes their own ad numbers, which is why the cost of a Meta lead is a rumour ranging from $8 to $150 depending on who is selling what. These are ours, from the ads manager, for the seven days ending 5 September 2026.
| Seven days, one campaign | |
|---|---|
| Spend | $18,452.78 |
| Qualified leads | 767 |
| Cost per qualified lead | $24.07 |
| Daily spend | About $2,636 |
| Share of our total Meta spend | Roughly 90% |
| Basis | Measured — our own ads manager, 30 Aug to 5 Sep 2026 |

A lead is not a form fill. Every one of the 767 cleared the same gates the leads we sell clear, enforced on the page rather than by a rep afterwards.
Submissions that failed any gate went to a separate page and were never counted, never sent to Meta and never called. That matters for the number: a cost per lead that includes the disqualified is a different, smaller-looking figure, and it is the one most people quote.
The rate is the output of a system, not of a budget. Three parts, and the video covers each: six angles of creative in static and video, uploaded in volume and left for Meta to sort; a funnel with only the friction that earns its place; and a pixel that fires for qualified submissions only, so the algorithm is optimising towards the merchant we want rather than towards whoever will fill in a form.
Our exclusive leads sell at $60. The same lead costs $24.07 to generate at scale — before the media buyer, the creative output, the page, the verification service and the learning weeks that sit outside the ad account. The gap is real and it is smaller than it looks, and the full comparison is about owning a channel rather than saving on a lead. But the honest version of that comparison starts from a measured figure, and this is it.
Our own main campaign ran at $24.07 per qualified lead over the seven days to 5 September 2026 — $18,452.78 for 767 leads, each phone-verified and above $30K a month. A new account at a low budget should expect to pay more while it settles.
767 qualified submissions in our case, over seven days on one campaign — but only with qualification enforced on the page, a one-time passcode on the form, and the pixel firing for qualified leads alone. Without those the count is higher and the leads are worth less.
Not in month one. The figure comes from an account spending about $2,600 a day with hundreds of creatives in rotation. At $100 a day, expect a higher cost per lead until delivery stabilises, then a fall towards it as the creative pipeline finds what works.
Because nobody else does, and the market prices leads on rumours as a result. A benchmark without a basis is a number someone made up; this one is from our ads manager, and we say exactly what “qualified” meant.
No. Submissions that failed a gate went to a separate page, were never sent to Meta and were never counted. Including them produces a smaller-looking figure that describes a worse product.
We will tell you straight up if we cannot help you. No commission deals, no free trials, no chasing you for three weeks.