Skip to content
Infinite Bookings
MCA leads by vertical

MCA leads for staffing agencies

The purest working capital problem in the market. A staffing agency pays its people weekly and bills its clients on net-30 to net-60, which means growth actively consumes cash — the more placements they make, the wider the gap gets. That is why they borrow, and it is why they borrow repeatedly.

Typical revenue
$50K–$500K/month, scaling fast in either direction
Typical advance
$25K–$150K
Price per lead
$60

What a staffing agencies file looks like

The purest working capital problem in the market. A staffing agency pays its people weekly and bills its clients on net-30 to net-60, which means growth actively consumes cash — the more placements they make, the wider the gap gets. That is why they borrow, and it is why they borrow repeatedly.

Seasonality

Light industrial and warehouse staffing peaks sharply into the fourth quarter and collapses in January. Professional and healthcare staffing is far steadier. A January statement on a light industrial agency is the worst month it will show all year.

How this vertical underwrites

  • Revenue is almost entirely receivables against commercial clients, so the real question is who those clients are and how reliably they pay — not what the agency itself looks like.
  • Payroll is the dominant outflow and it is non-negotiable. An underwriter is checking whether a daily remittance leaves enough for Friday.
  • Many agencies already factor their invoices, which assigns the receivables an advance would draw against. This is the single most common blocker in the vertical.
  • Deposits arrive in large irregular lumps as client invoices clear, so daily averages badly misrepresent daily capacity.

The general order underwriters work in is covered in what funders actually look at. The points above are what differs here.

Why staffing agencies deals get declined

An existing invoice factoring facility with a blanket assignment

Client concentration where one account is most of the billings

Payroll tax liabilities, which sit ahead of every other creditor

Deposit timing too lumpy to support a fixed daily debit

Funder appetite

Split on structure rather than on the industry. Funders comfortable with receivables-driven businesses like staffing; those who price off daily card volume struggle with it. The agencies that get funded well are usually those whose broker understood the factoring question before submitting.

How we handle verticals

The feed is a round robin off live traffic, not a menu — we cannot promise a pure feed of any single industry. What we can do is tell you honestly whether the volume exists to weight your feed toward staffing agencies, before you spend anything.

Questions

$50K–$500K/month, scaling fast in either direction, with advances typically landing at $25K–$150K. Every lead clears the same six minimums regardless of vertical — $30K+ monthly revenue, $15K+ requested, six months trading, four months of statements available, U.S.-based and mobile-verified by a 6-digit code.

Not exclusively. The feed is a round robin off live traffic rather than a menu, so a pure single-industry feed is not something we can honestly promise. We can weight your feed toward a vertical where the volume supports it, and we will tell you plainly before you order whether it does.

An existing invoice factoring facility with a blanket assignment, most commonly. The others worth screening for on the first call are client concentration where one account is most of the billings, payroll tax liabilities, which sit ahead of every other creditor, deposit timing too lumpy to support a fixed daily debit.

$60 per lead across every vertical, with a 25-lead minimum. A feed filtered to merchants doing $50,000 a month or more is $70. Full pricing and the market context is on the buy page.

Get started.

We will tell you straight up if we cannot help you. No commission deals, no free trials, no chasing you for three weeks.

15 minute call

Rather not book?

Text my number instead